Fix cyclic dependencies #365
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
# Conflicts: # src/main/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/sa/AcSecurityAnalysis.java # src/main/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/sensi/AcSensitivityAnalysis.java # src/main/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/sensi/DcSensitivityAnalysis.java
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
flo-dup
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2021
src/main/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/equations/EquationUtil.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @@ -138,9 +137,16 @@ private SecurityAnalysisResult runSimulations(LfNetwork network, List<Propagated | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| // start a simulation for each of the contingency | |||
| Iterator<LfContingency> contingencyIt = contingencies.iterator(); | |||
| Iterator<PropagatedContingency> contingencyIt = propagatedContingencies.iterator(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Aside this PR, but I'm using it to ask: do we need a iterator? Shouldn't we restore the pre-contingency state at the end?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is an optimization because after last contingency simulation, we don't need to restore base case state.
No idea if it worse it or not...
flo-dup
reviewed
Oct 6, 2021
src/main/java/com/powsybl/openloadflow/sa/AcSecurityAnalysis.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@rte-france.com>
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
flo-dup
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use
'[x]'to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using
'#XXX'and skip the restWhat kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:
Other information:
(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)