-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Shunt compensator refactoring #410
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@gmail.com>
double qCalc = q.eval(); | ||
double bSum = shuntCompensators.stream() | ||
.mapToDouble(ShuntCompensator::getB) | ||
.sum(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Be careful here because even if we have one or several shunts connected to a bus, the sum could be equal to zero. All b
values can be equal to zero, or all b
can be non zero value but with a sum equals to zero.
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
@@ -19,5 +19,7 @@ | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we have access to the bus voltage in the LfShunt
, we don't need q
anymore. @geofjamg what do you think ?
Signed-off-by: Anne Tilloy <anne.tilloy@rte-france.com>
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed. |
this.shuntCompensator = Objects.requireNonNull(shuntCompensator); | ||
double nominalV = shuntCompensator.getTerminal().getVoltageLevel().getNominalV(); | ||
if (shuntCompensators.isEmpty()) { | ||
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Empty shunt compensator list"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could not happened indeed, I cannot unit test this line.
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian geoffroy.jamgotchian@gmail.com
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use
'[x]'
to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using
'#XXX'
and skip the restNo
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Refactoring
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
We create one equation per IIDM shunt compensator.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
We now create one equation for all IIDM shunt compensators connected to same bus.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:
Other information:
(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)