Determinist branchesToOpen order #516
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Dupuy <florian.dupuy@rte-france.com>
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
geofjamg
approved these changes
Apr 14, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ?
No
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bug fix (even though the order of branches to remove should not have any impact)
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
The branches to open set has no determinist order, hence the edges to cut for connectivity computation is in a random order
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
The branches to open set has a determinist order
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?
No