Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix weak refs with network store IIDM #727

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 10, 2023
Merged

Conversation

geofjamg
Copy link
Member

@geofjamg geofjamg commented Feb 8, 2023

Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian geoffroy.jamgotchian@gmail.com

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements (please use '[x]' to check the checkboxes, or submit the PR and then click the checkboxes)

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem ? If so, link to this issue using '#XXX' and skip the rest
No

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Bug fix.

What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
Weak references to IIDM objects added to support fast cache restart are not compatible with network IIDM implementation as calculated bus are not attached to the network but just returned by the topology calculation (and a different object is returned at each get).

loadflow-server_1                | 
loadflow-server_1                | java.lang.NullPointerException: Reference has been garbage collected
loadflow-server_1                | 	at java.base/java.util.Objects.requireNonNull(Objects.java:246) ~[na:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at com.powsybl.openloadflow.network.impl.Ref.get(Ref.java:24) ~[powsybl-open-loadflow-1.0.0.jar:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at com.powsybl.openloadflow.network.impl.LfBusImpl.getBus(LfBusImpl.java:55) ~[powsybl-open-loadflow-1.0.0.jar:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at com.powsybl.openloadflow.network.impl.LfBusImpl.updateState(LfBusImpl.java:90) ~[powsybl-open-loadflow-1.0.0.jar:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at com.powsybl.openloadflow.network.LfNetwork.updateState(LfNetwork.java:307) ~[powsybl-open-loadflow-1.0.0.jar:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at com.powsybl.openloadflow.OpenLoadFlowProvider.runAc(OpenLoadFlowProvider.java:130) ~[powsybl-open-loadflow-1.0.0.jar:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at com.powsybl.openloadflow.OpenLoadFlowProvider.lambda$run$2(OpenLoadFlowProvider.java:238) ~[powsybl-open-loadflow-1.0.0.jar:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.run(CompletableFuture.java:1700) ~[na:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$AsyncSupply.exec(CompletableFuture.java:1692) ~[na:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:290) ~[na:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.topLevelExec(ForkJoinPool.java:1020) ~[na:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.scan(ForkJoinPool.java:1656) ~[na:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1594) ~[na:na]
loadflow-server_1                | 	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:183) ~[na:na]

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
When network cache is not enabled we use strong references.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API? If yes, check the following:

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration guide has been updated in the github wiki (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

(if any of the questions/checkboxes don't apply, please delete them entirely)

Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@gmail.com>
@geofjamg geofjamg requested a review from annetill February 8, 2023 15:11
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@annetill annetill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NodeBreakerTraverser: this class is using Network and many IIDM objets.
Networks: it seems that we are doing a state reset for DC loadflow. It is an issue for network in cache in DC loadflow engine?
Contingences and actions also need the Network: I think we need to forbid cache for security analysis and sensitivity analysis.
Our feature is not compatible with VSC converter station targetV change because we rely on the HVDC and both converter stations. So we have to keep that in mind for next steps.
in AbstractLfBranch, we manipulate ratioTapChanger and phaseTapChanger for the update.
In LfHvdcImpl, we manipulate the extension HvdcAngleDrooÂctivePowerExtension.

geofjamg and others added 2 commits February 9, 2023 21:24
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@gmail.com>
@geofjamg
Copy link
Member Author

geofjamg commented Feb 9, 2023

NodeBreakerTraverser: this class is using Network and many IIDM objets.
Networks: it seems that we are doing a state reset for DC loadflow. It is an issue for network in cache in DC loadflow engine?
Contingences and actions also need the Network: I think we need to forbid cache for security analysis and sensitivity analysis.
Our feature is not compatible with VSC converter station targetV change because we rely on the HVDC and both converter stations. So we have to keep that in mind for next steps.
in AbstractLfBranch, we manipulate ratioTapChanger and phaseTapChanger for the update.
In LfHvdcImpl, we manipulate the extension HvdcAngleDrooÂctivePowerExtension.

I deactivated caching for DC LF, AC & DC AS, AC & DC sensi.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@geofjamg geofjamg merged commit 49570ae into main Feb 10, 2023
@geofjamg geofjamg deleted the fix_cache_network_store branch February 10, 2023 12:17
geofjamg added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2023
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants