Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactoring warnings of java part #663

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 17, 2023
Merged

refactoring warnings of java part #663

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 17, 2023

Conversation

EtienneLt
Copy link
Contributor

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration guide has been updated in the github wiki (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

Other information:

@EtienneLt EtienneLt requested a review from geofjamg October 16, 2023 08:46
@EtienneLt EtienneLt self-assigned this Oct 16, 2023
@EtienneLt EtienneLt changed the title refactor warnings of java part refactoring warnings of java part Oct 16, 2023
Signed-off-by: Etienne LESOT <etienne.lesot@rte-france.com>
@EtienneLt EtienneLt force-pushed the refactor-switch-cases branch from aeb0cf7 to 591dd01 Compare October 16, 2023 08:53
Signed-off-by: Geoffroy Jamgotchian <geoffroy.jamgotchian@gmail.com>
@geofjamg geofjamg merged commit f4d55bd into main Oct 17, 2023
7 checks passed
@geofjamg geofjamg deleted the refactor-switch-cases branch October 17, 2023 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants