Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove Appveyor and Travis CI #227

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2019
Merged

Remove Appveyor and Travis CI #227

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2019

Conversation

nbraud
Copy link
Contributor

@nbraud nbraud commented Apr 3, 2019

Obsoleted by Cirrus CI in #216.
To be merged once Cirrus has been in use long enough.

@nbraud
Remove Appveyor and Travis CI
4818005 
Obsoleted by Cirrus CI in ppb#216
@nbraud nbraud requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2019 11:42
@AstraLuma
Copy link
Member

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2019
@bors @nbraud
Merge #227
9501517 
227: Remove Appveyor and Travis CI r=astronouth7303 a=nbraud

Obsoleted by Cirrus CI in #216.
To be merged once Cirrus has been in use long enough.

Co-authored-by: Nicolas Braud-Santoni <nicolas@braud-santoni.eu>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Apr 22, 2019

Build succeeded

  • dockerfiles
  • docs
  • Linux Dockerfile:.ci/dockerfiles/python_3.6-slim
  • Linux Dockerfile:.ci/dockerfiles/python_3.7-slim
  • macOS PYTHON:3.6.8
  • macOS PYTHON:3.7.2
  • Windows Dockerfile:.ci/dockerfiles/python_3.6-windowsservercore-1809
  • Windows Dockerfile:.ci/dockerfiles/python_3.7-windowsservercore-1809

@bors bors bot merged commit 4818005 into ppb:master Apr 22, 2019
@nbraud nbraud deleted the qa/remove-old-ci branch April 22, 2019 20:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@nbraud @AstraLuma