Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update bid pool logic to use highest cpm bid #2654

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 30, 2018
Merged

Conversation

jaiminpanchal27
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #2448

@jsnellbaker
Copy link
Collaborator

To note - believe should also fix #2539

src/targeting.js Outdated
;

return getHighestCpmBidsFromBidPool(bidsReceived);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice code reuse!

// bucket by adUnitcode
let buckets = groupBy(bidsReceived, 'adUnitCode');
// filter top bid for each bucket by bidder
Object.keys(buckets).forEach(bucketKey => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bucketKey => adUnitCode
(I know you just moved it but might as well fix it now)

@mkendall07 mkendall07 merged commit 0f14b96 into master May 30, 2018
Pupis pushed a commit to adform/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2018
* update bid pool logic to use highest cpm bid

* updates to cover prebid#2539

* typo in property name
dluxemburg pushed a commit to Genius/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2018
* update bid pool logic to use highest cpm bid

* updates to cover prebid#2539

* typo in property name
@mkendall07 mkendall07 deleted the update-bidpool branch August 17, 2018 15:13
ghost pushed a commit to devunrulymedia/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2019
* update bid pool logic to use highest cpm bid

* updates to cover prebid#2539

* typo in property name
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants