Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code} #3062

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 11, 2018

Conversation

ZLester
Copy link
Contributor

@ZLester ZLester commented Sep 9, 2018

Type of change

  • Bugfix

Description of change

Per #3059, the targeting key hb_deal is being replaced by hb_deal_${bidder_code} rather than both being sent. This pull will change the logic of getWinningBidTargeting to return both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

Other information

Fixes #3059 per @snapwich's report. + @mkendall07 and @jaiminpanchal27

Copy link
Member

@mkendall07 mkendall07 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix! could you add a test for this?

Copy link
Collaborator

@harpere harpere left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@harpere harpere added needs 2nd review Core module updates require two approvals from the core team and removed needs review labels Sep 10, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@idettman idettman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@harpere harpere added LGTM and removed needs 2nd review Core module updates require two approvals from the core team labels Sep 11, 2018
@harpere harpere merged commit ebfbc54 into prebid:master Sep 11, 2018
ptomasroos pushed a commit to happypancake/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2018
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
StefanWallin pushed a commit to mittmedia/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2018
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
SublimeJeremy pushed a commit to SublimeSkinz/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2018
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
ghost pushed a commit to devunrulymedia/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2019
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
pedrolopezmrf pushed a commit to Marfeel/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2019
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
AlessandroDG pushed a commit to simplaex/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2019
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
AlessandroDG pushed a commit to simplaex/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2019
…rebid#3062)

* Fix prebid#3059 by returning both hb_deal and hb_deal_${bidder_code}

* Add unit test per @mkendall07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Possible bug in 1.0 with hb_deal being replaced with hb_deal_bidder
6 participants