Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PulsePoint: CCPA and new UserId partner integration #4565

Merged
merged 38 commits into from
Dec 11, 2019
Merged

PulsePoint: CCPA and new UserId partner integration #4565

merged 38 commits into from
Dec 11, 2019

Conversation

anand-venkatraman
Copy link
Contributor

Type of change

  • Feature - CCPA support and support for new user id providers.

* ET-1691: Adding pulsepoint analytics and tests for pulsepoint adapter

* ET-1691: Adding pulsepoint analytics and tests for pulsepoint adapter

* ET-1691: cleanup

* ET-1691: minor

* ET-1691: revert package.json change
Copy link
Contributor

@idettman idettman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@idettman idettman self-assigned this Dec 11, 2019
@idettman idettman merged commit 7c0c732 into prebid:master Dec 11, 2019
@idettman idettman added the LGTM label Dec 11, 2019
@bretg
Copy link
Collaborator

bretg commented Dec 11, 2019

docs PR prebid/prebid.github.io#1671

tadam75 pushed a commit to smartadserver/Prebid.js that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2020
* ET-1691: Pulsepoint Analytics adapter for Prebid. (#1)

* ET-1691: Adding pulsepoint analytics and tests for pulsepoint adapter

* ET-1691: Adding pulsepoint analytics and tests for pulsepoint adapter

* ET-1691: cleanup

* ET-1691: minor

* ET-1691: revert package.json change

* Adding bidRequest to bidFactory.createBid method as per prebid#509

* ET-1765: Adding support for additional params in PulsePoint adapter (#2)

* ET-1850: Fixing prebid#866

* Minor fix

* Adding mandatory parameters to Bid

* PulsePoint: CCPA and new user id partner integration

* Review comment
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants