-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add smartxBidAdapter #5275
Add smartxBidAdapter #5275
Conversation
This reverts commit da2aea7.
This pull request introduces 4 alerts when merging ee2546c into 707a103 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This pull request introduces 4 alerts when merging 7f09b06 into 8083239 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
The adapter is still "in review" - i don't know why. |
This pull request introduces 4 alerts when merging 4a96e3a into 240e605 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
Thanks for making that update. The tests/files here look good. Did you make the docs PR? I think that's the only outstanding item currently. If you did, please link it here. Thanks! |
}, | ||
video: { | ||
context: 'outstream', | ||
playerSize: [640, 360] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does the player size itself to this fixed size or does it scale itself in a responsive way like the direct integration at the moment does?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The player sizes in a responsive way.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay. So these sizes are just a hint? Or are they used in anyway?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need these values for our system.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But for what 😂
- Some SSPs use those to calculate the ratio - then I need to make sure we insert widht x height with optimal ratio for our content
- Some SSPs use those for the demand site - then we input the sizes with the highest demand
- Some SSPs actually size the player with this - then I don't know what to do on a responsive site 😛
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @muuki88,
we use the sizes to pass them on to the DSPs.
utils.logError(BIDDER_CODE + ': siteId is not present in bidder params'); | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
if (!utils.getBidIdParameter('bidfloor', bid.params)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This parameter is actually optional, right? Below you check for empty string instead of undefined.
I would prefer leaving this parameter out instead of setting it to an empty string.
Also this seems to mix two types. Number and string , which I'm not sure is intended
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No these are not optional. In the old approaches of the adapter these were optional, so these queries were written like this. Now these parameters are mandatory and so I threw out these queries and save the bidfloor and bidfloorcur in constants within the next commit.
modules/smartxBidAdapter.js
Outdated
utils.logError(BIDDER_CODE + ': bidfloorcur is not present in bidder params'); | ||
return false; | ||
} | ||
if (utils.deepAccess(bid, 'mediaTypes.video.context') == 'outstream') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Triple equals is usually the safer choice
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
…n the markdown with more use cases
This pull request introduces 4 alerts when merging a0a22f9 into 32066aa - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
Hi @jsnellbaker, Thanks |
This pull request introduces 4 alerts when merging aa4dbc1 into 01f4b28 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
This pull request introduces 4 alerts when merging 8b346a3 into 01f4b28 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
modules/smartxBidAdapter.js
Outdated
}; | ||
const context1 = utils.deepAccess(currentBidRequest, 'mediaTypes.video.context'); | ||
const context2 = utils.deepAccess(currentBidRequest, 'params.ad_unit'); | ||
if (context1 == 'outstream' || context2 == 'outstream') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I overlooked those. Triple equals again is safer.
Why have two options configuring the context
? What happens when the context2
is oustream
but the others are instream
? Then a player is loaded, but everything is configured for instream
?
Maybe this parameter can be removed all together?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed context2, as we are not using params.ad_unit for context identifier.
modules/smartxBidAdapter.js
Outdated
var contextcustom = utils.deepAccess(bid, 'mediaTypes.video.context'); | ||
var placement = 1; | ||
|
||
if (contextcustom == 'outstream') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Triple equals.
The context in the bid.params
is not taken into account. See my comment below. Maybe the context
in the params is redundant and can be removed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
… in params.ad_units. Adjusted query. smartxBidAdapter_spec.js - fixed typo
This pull request introduces 4 alerts when merging 3f2ceec into 01f4b28 - view on LGTM.com new alerts:
|
Just to confirm - are there any further changes planned (in lieu of the recent conversations)? Or are you all set from your end at this point? Thanks. |
We are ready at this time, but there will be updates in the future, for sure. Thanks a lot! |
var rs = this.readyState; | ||
if (rs && rs != 'complete' && rs != 'loaded') return; | ||
try { | ||
SmartPlay(elementId, smartPlayObj); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @jsnellbaker,
the adapter is released, thanks a lot.
We are facing now problems due to minified code that gets delivered when downloading the adapter from the official page. At this line we create our Outstream-Script Player and we are calling several functions (sc_smartIntxtStart(n), sc_smartIntxtNoad(n), sc_smartIntxtEnd(n), SmartPlay(elementId, smartPlayObj))
related to our out-stream player but in the minified version they get replaced with (void 0)(r)
and console error Prebid ERROR: error caught : TypeError: (void 0) is not a function
so the outstream part doesn't work, what can we do so that the function createOutstreamScript(bid)
is not changed in the later download version?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What if you try to call the script function from the window
instead of calling it on its own? Since it doesn't seem the SmartPlay
variable gets defined within the scope of the bidAdapter code (which is likely why it converted it to the void(0)
to check if it was undefined), calling from the window sould give it a definite reliable source even in the minified state.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are loading our out-stream playerlibary with the "https://dco.smartclip.net/?plc=7777777" call, there the mentioned functions are available. I have implemented the prebid.js on a test page and replaced the voids with the originally defined functions, everything works fine there.So in our opinion it is only necessary to prevent that the 4 function calls are not changed. Is this possible?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue with the minified build is that it is likely seeing these variables never get assigned an actual value. While this isn't the case in a real page (because you expect the script to execute and overwrite the placeholders), it doesn't change from what build stack sees in the code.
In regards to the 3 'callback' functions, why are they defined here in the adapter file and not included as part of the script code? These functions don't read any values from inside the bidAdapter file to pass along into the script file. It's just my guess, but the callback functions appear to be internal functions that are within the script file. Could these 3 functions (onStartCallback
, onCappedCallback
, onEndCallback
) just be taken out of the config object and moved inside the script itself?
For the SmartPlay
call at line 376, I tried to change the reference to be window.SmartPlay(...
and it appeared to work with the build file was minified (see example below).
Can you give this a try on your end?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We use callback functions to give customers the flexibility to use callbacks should certain events
occur. For example, customers can define the function sc_smartIntxtStart() on their webpage, which will be called by our player when the promotional video starts and the event gets fired.
The issue with the minified build is that it is likely seeing these variables never get assigned an actual value.
Do you mean this variables?
// eslint-disable-next-line camelcase
var sc_smartIntxtStart;
// eslint-disable-next-line camelcase
var sc_smartIntxtNoad;
// eslint-disable-next-line camelcase
var sc_smartIntxtEnd;
var SmartPlay;
If yes:
We added them back then on your hint due to lint
errors, actually we don't need them and can leave them out. Or is it possible that exactly these variables confuse the minifier?
If not:
Do you mean the functions?
Here is the test site only with added 4 functions, I've tested it with window.
before and it seems to work as well but I would prefer to let them be as they are and use this solution only if no other is available:
https://gt-adtech.de/var/www/testsite/prod/prebid_test.html
Could you please check if there are options for the minifier to ignore these 4 functions or could be the solution to remove the above not needed variables?
Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @jsnellbaker,
did you already have time to have a look at it? We want to fix the problem as soon as possible, because the current version does not work like this.
Thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @Skylinar
I meant callback functions altogether. We can't have improperly defined functions within the code since it could lead to the chance that someone doesn't define the overridden function properly on their site and it would cause a hard undefined exception error in prebid - interfering with the rest of the auction.
If they're values that can be overwritten by the page so the publisher can customize what happens, then maybe this part of the logic could be handled inside the script itself instead of passing it in as part of a tentative config.
By removing them from being in an 'undefined'/uninitialized state in the adapter, it would avoid the lint errors and confusing part of the logic (since on its own, it's not clear where these functions are coming from or what they're doing).
I understand if there may be other reasons why this may not be an option (or at least something quick to implement).
In this case, I think you'll have to read these functions from the window
to preserve their proper function status. I don't know of anything else we can do in the minifying step to just skip over this part of the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @jsnellbaker,
I've created a new PR where we call it with window
. Could you please check?
Thank you!
}, | ||
onStartCallback: function (m, n) { | ||
try { | ||
sc_smartIntxtStart(n); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comment above.
}, | ||
onCappedCallback: function (m, n) { | ||
try { | ||
sc_smartIntxtNoad(n); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comment above.
}, | ||
onEndCallback: function (m, n) { | ||
try { | ||
sc_smartIntxtEnd(n); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See comment above.
// const slot = utils.getBidIdParameter('slot', bid.renderer.config.outstream_options); | ||
utils.logMessage('[SMARTX][renderer] Handle SmartX outstream renderer'); | ||
const elementId = bid.adUnitCode; | ||
// eslint-disable-next-line camelcase |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible that lines 335-340 are causing the problem? As far as i can remember it was pointed out in the course of the PR that we should define the callback functions as empty variables before to pass the lint test.
* Add smartclipBidAdapter * Updated imported files * .js file * Beautify code * Revert "Beautify code" This reverts commit da2aea7. * testing * partial tab fix * syntax fixes * further syntax fixes * Trailing spaces... * const parameters fpr smartInTxt Functions * const to var * // eslint-disable-next-line camelcase * new commit * Update Targeting * Update syntax * beautify code * remove trailing spaces * Update smartclipBidAdapter.md * Update smartclipBidAdapter.js * Update smartclipBidAdapter.js * rename files * added first unit tests, further adjustments * adjusted queries, ran gulp lint, etc * adjustments, further tests * extendet unit tests * naming for spec * adjusted bidfloor and bidfloorcur, removed old queries, adjustments in the markdown with more use cases * added more use cases within md file * layout fix * md layout * smartxBidAdapter.js - triple equals, removed context2 due to not used in params.ad_units. Adjusted query. smartxBidAdapter_spec.js - fixed typo Co-authored-by: smartclip AdTechnology <adtech@smartclip.com> Co-authored-by: Gino Cirlini <skylinar@web.de>
This reverts commit aee5421.
Type of change
Description of change
Be sure to test the integration with your adserver using the Hello World sample page.
For any changes that affect user-facing APIs or example code documented on http://prebid.org, please provide:
Other information