-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create module registry: update build to add installModules array to pbjs global #6601
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ad27af7
- Remove module list comment on build
mmoschovas 5d45d11
Removed unused code
mmoschovas 848f198
Removed comma
mmoschovas 8a72a78
Recommitting changes
mmoschovas 0d9acd0
Updated regex to look for either '|" in macro name. Seems there is a …
mmoschovas File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a reason to drop this line? having the list of modules at the top of the prebid code is really useful when debugging code and looking at it as a human
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Based on the issue, we did not want to add more to the JS than necessary by having duplicate lists. So it was removed from the comment to live solely in the array.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My read on the issue was to drop the string so that "machines" could use an array more intelligently than hacking some text; but the text is still important for humans. The way it's implemented now makes it harder for humans to find the list, although still better than prior to the banner being there.
@bretg do you have strong feelings on this? My vote would be to leave the banner AND add the array that was added here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While I appreciate that the array is somewhat harder for a person to read, Prebid.js is constantly under fire for being larger than desired. An average publisher likely uses 5 bid adapters and 3-5 other modules, so the list of module names is likely between 150-200 bytes. Replicating that list seems to drive us away from the goal of making the build package smaller.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While I don't personally think the few extra bytes is a big deal, I can appreciate that some pubs do. Can we at least add a util function that prints the list modules so I can just hit that in console rather than digging for the array in the source code?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@smenzer I put in the other comment you can add pbjs.installedModules to the console to get the array printed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah you're right sorry I missed that.