-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 748
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Legacy UIDs From Cookie #2768
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that the legacy code has been removed, I think you can simplify this logic getting rid of the
else
and the second instance of the assignment to an empty map as such:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code is unmarshaling an existing cookie. In the "happy path"
cookie.uids = cookieContract.UIDs
always runs and the newmake
statement is a wasted. Consider a compromise:This way
uids
is ensured to never be nil and only makes the map if needed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comparing it to the previous functionality, I see an edge case we missed. If
cookie.optOut
istrue
and there are existing cookies in the collection, they will remain. I doubt it matters in practice, but perhaps we should protect against that case to be safe:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic looks good. It's a bit alarming that the tests weren't failing when we missed the edge case. I see that the following tests are exactly the same:
TestOptOutCookie
TestEmptyOptOutCookie
I believe
TestOptOutCookie
should be modified to something like this:and that we should then modify
ensureConsistency
so the cookie size after parsing is verified to be 0 if we are opting out: