feat: add back older caching method #2046
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nichmor
approved these changes
Sep 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add back older caching method, at it seems to work much better for uv.
I think github caching got a lot faster again, caching downloding for uv takes about a minute but the runs speed up considerably. So why this seems so much faster I don't really know, when its in I'll add lines to only save the cache in
mainbuilds from another PR.We could also start using buildjet: https://github.com/Swatinem/rust-cache/blob/master/.github/workflows/buildjet.yml that gives us a 20G limit instead of 10G.