Add section on (lack of) interaction with Storage Access API permissions. #42
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DCtheTall
requested changes
Jun 16, 2022
Co-authored-by: Dylan Cutler <13906920+DCtheTall@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There's no privacy benefit that would come from blocking access to partitioned cookies when the Storage Access API permission has been refused or dismissed, and having access to partitioned cookies would be consistent with the existing access to partitioned storage on the device in such a scenario. So partitioned cookies should always be accessible, even if a Storage Access API prompt was previously rejected or dismissed.