Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update ansible git to only clone when repo isn't there #95

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

eriktaubeneck
Copy link
Member

@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck commented Nov 25, 2024

small ansible change

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced Ansible playbook to check for existing Git repositories before cloning.
    • Added functionality to pull the latest changes if the repository already exists.
    • Included a check for Git installation, with automatic installation if not found.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated parameter from the repository cloning task for improved functionality.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 25, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
draft ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 25, 2024 8:22pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the Ansible playbook located in sidecar/ansible/provision.yaml introduce logic to check for the existence of a Git repository in the user's home directory. If the repository does not exist, it will clone it; if it does exist, the playbook will pull the latest changes. Additionally, a check for the installation of Git has been added, ensuring it is installed if not already present. The overall structure of the playbook remains unchanged, with these enhancements integrated into the existing workflow.

Changes

File Change Summary
sidecar/ansible/provision.yaml - Added check for Git repository existence.
- Modified logic for cloning and pulling repo.
- Removed update: no from cloning task.
- Added task to check and install Git if not present.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Ansible
    participant GitRepo

    User->>Ansible: Start playbook
    Ansible->>GitRepo: Check if repo exists
    alt Repo does not exist
        Ansible->>GitRepo: Clone repository
    else Repo exists
        Ansible->>GitRepo: Pull latest changes
    end
    Ansible->>User: Complete playbook
Loading

🐰 "In the garden where code does bloom,
A rabbit hops, dispelling gloom.
With Git in check, and tasks aligned,
Cloning and pulling, all well-defined.
Let's celebrate this joyful change,
In the world of code, we rearrange!" 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
sidecar/ansible/provision.yaml (2)

71-77: Consider adding safety parameters and making the branch configurable.

While the pull task is well-structured, consider these improvements:

  1. Add force: no to prevent discarding local changes
  2. Make the branch configurable via a variable instead of hardcoding 'main'
    - name: Pull repository if it does exist
      git:
        repo: 'https://github.com/private-attribution/draft.git'
        dest: '{{ ansible_env.HOME }}/draft'
        clone: false
-       version: main
+       version: "{{ git_branch | default('main') }}"
+       force: no
      when: git_repo.stat.exists

59-77: Consider DRY principle and error handling improvements.

A few suggestions to enhance maintainability and reliability:

  1. Define the repository URL as a variable to avoid duplication
  2. Add error handling for Git operations

Example refactor:

    - name: Set Git variables
      set_fact:
        git_repo_url: 'https://github.com/private-attribution/draft.git'
        git_repo_path: '{{ ansible_env.HOME }}/draft'

    # ... your existing stat check ...

    - name: Clone repository if it doesn't exist
      git:
        repo: '{{ git_repo_url }}'
        dest: '{{ git_repo_path }}'
      when: not git_repo.stat.exists
      register: git_clone_result
      ignore_errors: yes

    - name: Handle Git clone failure
      fail:
        msg: "Failed to clone repository: {{ git_clone_result.msg }}"
      when: git_clone_result.failed is defined and git_clone_result.failed

    - name: Pull repository if it does exist
      git:
        repo: '{{ git_repo_url }}'
        dest: '{{ git_repo_path }}'
        clone: false
        version: "{{ git_branch | default('main') }}"
        force: no
      when: git_repo.stat.exists
      register: git_pull_result
      ignore_errors: yes

    - name: Handle Git pull failure
      fail:
        msg: "Failed to pull repository: {{ git_pull_result.msg }}"
      when: git_pull_result.failed is defined and git_pull_result.failed
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b08956f and 568d028.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • sidecar/ansible/provision.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
sidecar/ansible/provision.yaml (2)

59-63: LGTM! Well-structured directory check.

The implementation correctly uses the stat module to check for the Git repository's existence, and properly registers the result for conditional execution of subsequent tasks.


68-68: LGTM! Proper conditional execution added.

The condition ensures the clone operation only runs when necessary, improving efficiency and maintaining idempotency.

@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck merged commit 232ada0 into main Nov 25, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@eriktaubeneck eriktaubeneck deleted the provision-bug branch November 25, 2024 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants