Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typos #394

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2022
Merged

Fix typos #394

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2022

Conversation

kianmeng
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ wait_pids(N) ->
{ok, _Pid, _Res } ->
wait_pids(N-1)
after ?TIMEOUT_PARALLEL_SPAWN ->
{error, {timout, N}} % N missing answer
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this lead to a functional change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Potentially, yes. Should I revert?

I've checked the develop branch, it was only used here with no test case written for verify this.

$ rg "timout"
src/tsung/ts_utils.erl
591:            {error, {timout, N}} % N missing answer

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You might even have fixed a bug with this?

Potentially, yes. Should I revert?

I am not affiliated to this project, so it is not for me to say. Generally, I would advise to split this up in multiple parts: one that has the spelling fixes that are sure to have no side effects, and other parts for each potential functional change.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We'll let the repo owner to decide on this. Thanks.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This function doesn't seem to be used internally (possibly by some external consumer?), but i think that change is fine.

@prefiks prefiks merged commit b0ed229 into processone:develop Jul 27, 2022
@kianmeng
Copy link
Contributor Author

🥳 🥳 🥳 🥳 🥳

@nniclausse nniclausse added this to the 1.8.0 milestone Feb 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants