Post-merge updates for IM/DM separation #33730
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… eventid is not the same as event number
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
andyg-apple,
anush-apple,
arkq,
bauerschwan,
bzbarsky-apple,
carol-apple,
cecille,
chrisdecenzo,
chshu,
chulspro,
cliffamzn,
Damian-Nordic,
dhrishi,
fessehaeve,
harimau-qirex,
harsha-rajendran,
hawk248,
hicklin,
jepenven-silabs and
jmartinez-silabs
pullapprove
bot
requested review from
tobiasgraf,
turon,
vivien-apple,
wiba-nordic,
woody-apple,
younghak-hwang,
yufengwangca and
yunhanw-google
|
PR #33730: Size comparison from 3cc96a1 to d34e51d Full report (3 builds for cc32xx, stm32)
|
|
PR #33730: Size comparison from 3cc96a1 to 5332c0b Full report (47 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32)
|
|
PR #33730: Size comparison from 3cc96a1 to b95086c Full report (83 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink)
|
|
PR #33730: Size comparison from 3cc96a1 to 2f548a6 Full report (83 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I resolved the comments on #32914 that are fixed by this PR so far, but a bunch are still unresolved.
Co-authored-by: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@apple.com>
bzbarsky-apple
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2024
I will do my best, however given the diverse nature of the comments I may still miss some. On the plus side, what I also expect is that we will have a final pass before we turn this on to replace existing emeber-compatibility-functions so we will have another chance to sanity-review then as a whole. Thank you for the deep reviews so far! |
robszewczyk
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2024
yunhanw-google
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Going through review comments post-submit in #32914
Changes:
Not addressed: