Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[4.6] Better handle hitting the memory limit #55

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: rhaos-4.6
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kolyshkin
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a backport of upstream opencontainers/runc#2812 to rhaos-4.6 branch, as requested by @haircommander. A few not-too-relevant commits were omitted.

Currently, we read and parse 5 different files while we only need 1.

Use GetCgroupParamUint() directly to get current limit.

While at it, remove the workaround previously needed for the unit test,
and make it a bit more verbose.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3cced52)
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
1. Factor out setMemory and setSwap
2. Pass cgroup.Resources (rather than cgroup) to setMemoryAndSwap().
3. Merge the duplicated "set memory, set swap" case.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 27fd3fc)
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
EBUSY when trying to set memory limit may mean the new limit is too low
(lower than the current usage, and the kernel can't do anything).
Provide a more specific error for such case.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1880d2f)
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Generalize the libct/getValueFromCgroup() as fscommon.GetValueByKey(),
and document it.

No changes other than using fscommon.ParseUint to convert the value.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9fa65f6)
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
In some cases, container init fails to start because it is killed by
the kernel OOM killer. The errors returned by runc in such cases are
semi-random and rather cryptic. Below are a few examples.

On cgroup v1 + systemd cgroup driver:

> process_linux.go:348: copying bootstrap data to pipe caused: write init-p: broken pipe

> process_linux.go:352: getting the final child's pid from pipe caused: EOF

On cgroup v2:

> process_linux.go:495: container init caused: read init-p: connection reset by peer

> process_linux.go:484: writing syncT 'resume' caused: write init-p: broken pipe

This commits adds the OOM method to cgroup managers, which tells whether
the container was OOM-killed. In case that has happened, the original error
is discarded (unless --debug is set), and the new OOM error is reported
instead:

> ERRO[0000] container_linux.go:367: starting container process caused: container init was OOM-killed (memory limit too low?)

Also, fix the rootless test cases that are failing because they expect
an error in the first line, and we have an additional warning now:

> unable to get oom kill count" error="no directory specified for memory.oom_control

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5d0ffbf)
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
An exec may fail due to memory shortage (cgroup memory limits being too
tight), and an error message provided in this case is clueless:

> $ sudo ../runc/runc exec xx56 top
> ERRO[0000] exec failed: container_linux.go:367: starting container process caused: read init-p: connection reset by peer

Same as the previous commit for run/start, check the OOM kill counter
and report an OOM kill.

The differences from run are

1. The container is already running and OOM kill counter might not be
   zero.  This is why we have to read the counter before exec and after
   it failed.

2. An unrelated OOM kill event might occur in parallel with our exec
   (and I see no way to find out which process was killed, except to
   parse kernel logs which seems excessive and not very reliable).
   This is why we report _possible_ OOM kill.

With this commit, the error message looks like:

> ERRO[0000] exec failed: container_linux.go:367: starting container process caused: process_linux.go:105: possibly OOM-killed caused: read init-p: connection reset by peer

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 38b2dd3)
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant