-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add client cert support #70
Open
britcey
wants to merge
4
commits into
prometheus-community:master
Choose a base branch
from
britcey:feature/client_certs
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
none? hmmm, don't get this, why we need this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is what I was referring to in the first bullet point of the PR comment -
if you set a CAFile (or KeyFile/CertFile) in the defaults but didn't want it set in one of the specific receivers, you can't just set it to blank in the receiver config - the current config logic is that "if it's blank in the receiver config, use the default".
So I went with a "magic" value of "none" - I don't love that sort of magic, but I'm not sure what else to do short of totally rewriting the config logic. AFAICT, you can't set 'nil' in YAML - setting it to 'null' or '~' just results in an empty string.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would expect the following to work:
Marshal the default config
Then marshal the receiver config into the initialized default struct - all fields that are missing in the receiver's YAML will not override the defaults. All fields that are present in the receiver's config will override the default config.
In other words, when the field doesn't exist in the receiver config use the default and in all other cases use the field value from the receiver config.
Also, let's add a test for this to make it clear and make sure we don't break this logic in the feature
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(apologies for the big gap in responding - other work got in the way)
This may be my Go inexperience showing, but I believe that won't work as-is, since unmarshaling YAML with missing fields just initializes those fields to the empty string - it doesn't differentiate between "not specified" and "blank".
https://play.golang.org/p/_4ih2Xomnit
However, if I make them string pointers, the pointers will get initialized to nil if not set, which I can use to detect "not specified" vs. "blank". This appears to be one of the cases when using string pointers vs. strings makes sense: https://dhdersch.github.io/golang/2016/01/23/golang-when-to-use-string-pointers.html
Let me know if that sounds like a reasonable approach.