Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

protoc: parser rejects explicit use of map_entry option (#13479) #13527

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

protoc: parser rejects explicit use of map_entry option (#13479)

This addresses #13441. Second try, now with more internal fixes.

This preserves the similar check at the point of use of invalid messages in DescriptorBuilder (and there's an existing test that verifies that check still works).

But it adds another check in the parser, to catch this error at the point of definition of an invalid message. And the corresponding test is updated: we no longer need a usage of the message to catch the error, and the reported position is the definition of the option, not the usage site of the message.

The way this works feels kinda gross, but I wasn't sure of a better way to do it. The only place we know for certain that it was an explicit option (vs. auto-added by the parser when synthesizing a map entry message) is when after processing the message body, we can look at the uninterpreted options. So that's what this does. If you have ideas on better/cleaner approaches, I'd be happy to revise.

Closes #13479

This addresses #13441.  Second try, now with more internal fixes.

This preserves the similar check at the _point of use_ of invalid messages in `DescriptorBuilder` (and there's an existing test that verifies that check still works).

But it adds another check in the parser, to catch this error at the _point of definition_ of an invalid message. And the corresponding test is updated: we no longer need a usage of the message to catch the error, and the reported position is the definition of the option, not the usage site of the message.

The way this works feels kinda gross, but I wasn't sure of a better way to do it. The only place we know for certain that it was an explicit option (vs. auto-added by the parser when synthesizing a map entry message) is when after processing the message body, we can look at the uninterpreted options. So that's what this does. If you have ideas on better/cleaner approaches, I'd be happy to revise.

Closes #13479

PiperOrigin-RevId: 556335288
@copybara-service copybara-service bot closed this Aug 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant