-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Slic3r 1.42.0 alpha4]: Lithophane - Layers missing #1869
Comments
I'm also having this problem with Slic3r version 1.42.0 alpha5 |
The only difference between the slicing algorithm in 1.41.3 and
1.42.0-alpha5 is the gap closing step, which was suppressed in 1.42.0. You
may simulate this gap closing step by applying a positive offset to each
slice:
[image: image.png]
From the code comments:
Perform a safety offset to merge very close facets (TODO: find test case
for this)
Please read the issues referenced to get the idea of why we are tinkering
with the gap closing parameter.
Please try to enter 0.05 into the "XY Size Compensation" field in alpha5
whether it will solve your issues. Your slices will be 50um thicker, so it
is not a solution, but it will help to diagnose your problem.
In the final 1.42.0 version, we will most likely make the gap closing
offset configurable, as it seems to be an issue to many.
…On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 6:08 PM Dzieva ***@***.***> wrote:
A sample of what occurs with lithophane
[image: img_20190228_140147986]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/35209392/53584195-def55f80-3b61-11e9-8029-5cfa119abd1b.jpg>
This problem does not happen in Simplify3D
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1869 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFj5I1IhFcTUUc3z3wWeaSgHbgR9l9_Mks5vSA0BgaJpZM4bQecW>
.
|
I tried different parameters with XY Size Compensation and nothing helped (it actually got worse, even larger layers missing). If the initial idea was to make meshes watertight with the morphological closing operation it probably was a very quick solution to a very complex problem. In fact I couldn’t find this sort of solution in literature at all. (E.g.: A Practical Guide to Polygon Mesh Repairing or Model Repair) If the intention was to repair meshes (that are already watertight) this should require user interaction (on/off/set parameter) imho. |
Please provide an STL to test with, or better export the project (the 3mf file). Thank you.
Hmmm
Repairing triangular models is a difficult task indeed. That's why there are not many software packages that do it right, for example the Netfabb. We are not trying to compete with Netfabb. The task here is specific in that
|
All right, I am able to reproduce the issue with https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2631187/files |
Running the lion model through the netfabb fixing service (integrated with Slic3r PE on Windows 10), the litophane is sliced correctly even with the current master. I will have to look into why the 1.41.3 handles this broken model correctly, while the 1.42.0-alpha5 does not. |
Interesting. I imported and exported the lithophane stl in Meshmixer and now it worked in the alpha version too :) |
I hope I found the regression between 1.41.3 and 1.42.0-alpha7 in regard to closing gaps in the slices. I would still appreciate, if you could attach a 3MF, so I can retest with your data. |
It will be fixed in beta. Closing. |
1.42.0-Beta fixes this problem. |
As reported here link, Slicr alpha seems to have trouble slicing lithophanes. 1.41.3 works fine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: