Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Part 2 of Restructuring BeaconBlock Proto - Add BeaconBody #1066

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2018

Conversation

terencechain
Copy link
Member

Part of #781

This PR adds BeaconBody to Proto

@terencechain terencechain self-assigned this Dec 9, 2018
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 9, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #1066 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1066   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.16%   72.16%           
=======================================
  Files          75       75           
  Lines        4591     4591           
=======================================
  Hits         3313     3313           
  Misses        961      961           
  Partials      317      317

Copy link
Contributor

@rauljordan rauljordan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Beacon block body looks very clean, good stuff

@@ -170,14 +170,23 @@ message BeaconBlock {
// repeated AttestationRecord attestations = 6;
// Specials consist of exist, penalities, etc.
repeated SpecialRecord specials = 7 [deprecated=true]; // Deprecated in favor of unify specials object w/ attestations.
repeated bytes proposer_signature = 8; // Type of [uint384]?

repeated bytes signature = 8; // Type of [uint384]?
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did we define a uint384 type in proto in a separate file before? Can we use that

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should. Similar to what we did with Uint32List

@terencechain terencechain merged commit 1393e80 into master Dec 10, 2018
KimiWu123 pushed a commit to KimiWu123/prysm that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2018
@nisdas nisdas deleted the beaconBlockBody branch January 28, 2019 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants