Fix sha after v0.12.3 tarballs were re-uploaded. Unskip test to resolve #7277. #7292
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
prestonvanloon
added
OK to merge
Priority: Critical
|
Marking as "critical" as this issue may block PRs in buildkite. |
shayzluf
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2020
terencechain
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2020
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7292 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 59.50% 59.48% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 419 419
Lines 30134 30035 -99
==========================================
- Hits 17931 17867 -64
+ Misses 9265 9239 -26
+ Partials 2938 2929 -9 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
Other
What does this PR do? Why is it needed?
The tarballs for v0.12.3 spectests were re-uploaded with different data. The sha256 of these files has changed.
Which issues(s) does this PR fix?
Fixes #7277
Other notes for review
See: ethereum/consensus-specs#2076