Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validator: Choose a reasonable cap for the attested target epochs slice #8452

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 16, 2021

Conversation

prestonvanloon
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

Other

What does this PR do? Why is it needed?

A very small optimization which may provide a minor improvement on memory churn / usage.

Which issues(s) does this PR fix?

N/A

Other notes for review

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 16, 2021

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (develop@4bed8d4). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #8452   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   57.79%           
==========================================
  Files              ?      455           
  Lines              ?    32514           
  Branches           ?        0           
==========================================
  Hits               ?    18793           
  Misses             ?    10855           
  Partials           ?     2866           

@prylabs-bulldozer prylabs-bulldozer bot merged commit aef5a7b into develop Feb 16, 2021
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the allocate-cap branch February 16, 2021 01:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants