-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Regression fix: leave R prefixes capitalization alone #2285
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -495,6 +495,26 @@ async def foo(self): | |
f"9. You now have a key to add to `{prefix}set api youtube api_key`" | ||
) | ||
|
||
# It shouldn't matter if the string prefixes are capitalized. | ||
temp_msg = ( | ||
F"{F'{humanize_number(pos)}.': <{pound_len+2}} " | ||
F"{balance: <{bal_len + 5}} " | ||
F"<<{author.display_name}>>\n" | ||
) | ||
|
||
fstring = ( | ||
F"We have to remember to escape {braces}." | ||
" Like {these}." | ||
F" But not {this}." | ||
) | ||
|
||
welcome_to_programming = R"hello," R" world!" | ||
|
||
fstring = F"f-strings definitely make things more {difficult} than they need to be for {{black}}. But boy they sure are handy. The problem is that some lines will need to have the 'f' whereas others do not. This {line}, for example, needs one." | ||
|
||
x = F"This is a long string which contains an f-expr that should not split {{{[i for i in range(5)]}}}." | ||
|
||
|
||
# output | ||
|
||
|
||
|
@@ -1100,3 +1120,25 @@ async def foo(self): | |
"8. No application restrictions are needed. Click Create at the bottom." | ||
f"9. You now have a key to add to `{prefix}set api youtube api_key`" | ||
) | ||
|
||
# It shouldn't matter if the string prefixes are capitalized. | ||
temp_msg = ( | ||
f"{F'{humanize_number(pos)}.': <{pound_len+2}} " | ||
f"{balance: <{bal_len + 5}} " | ||
f"<<{author.display_name}>>\n" | ||
) | ||
|
||
fstring = f"We have to remember to escape {braces}. Like {{these}}. But not {this}." | ||
|
||
welcome_to_programming = R"hello," R" world!" | ||
|
||
fstring = ( | ||
f"f-strings definitely make things more {difficult} than they need to be for" | ||
" {black}. But boy they sure are handy. The problem is that some lines will need" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I like this style of test |
||
f" to have the 'f' whereas others do not. This {line}, for example, needs one." | ||
) | ||
|
||
x = ( | ||
"This is a long string which contains an f-expr that should not split" | ||
f" {{{[i for i in range(5)]}}}." | ||
) |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if this could not repeatedly append to the string and just calculate the index, and then slice the whole prefix at once 🤔 Not really a comment to the PR but came to my mind anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sadly
min(s.find("'"), s.find('"'))
doesn't quite work because no matches is returned as -1 😄 and it could be way less efficientThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm taking this as that no you have no nits or objections for this PR :)
Thanks for the review though! You're doing great adjusting to your new role!