Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Bytemark Hosting domains #620

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 8, 2018
Merged

Add Bytemark Hosting domains #620

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 8, 2018

Conversation

pcammish
Copy link
Contributor

Specifically uk0.bigv.io, dh.bytemark.co.uk, and vm.bytemark.co.uk.

Bytemark Hosting provides both dedicated and virtual servers on the above domains, with customer host provided subdomains (and sub-sub domains) of the above.

Relevant TXT records should be along soon.

uk0.bigv.io, dh.bytemark.co.uk, and vm.bytemark.co.uk
@pcammish
Copy link
Contributor Author

DNS is live for vm.bytemark.co.uk and dh.bytemark.co.uk:

$ dig +short TXT _psl.vm.bytemark.co.uk
"https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/pull/620"

$ dig +short TXT _psl.dh.bytemark.co.uk
"https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/pull/620"

The TXT record for uk0.bigv.io may take a while however, but email verification should be fine (although more hassle, sorry!)

sleevi
sleevi previously requested changes May 8, 2018
@@ -10819,6 +10819,12 @@ square7.net
// Submitted by Dave Tharp <browsersafetymark.io@quicinc.com>
browsersafetymark.io

// Bytemark Hosting : https://www.bytemark.co.uk
// Submitted by Paul Cammish <paul.cammish@bytemark.co.uk>
uk0.bigv.io
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm unable to verify that the TXT record exists

@sleevi sleevi added the 🩺 pending-validation Something needs to be validated label May 8, 2018
@pcammish
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @sleevi, unfortunately due to the way the uk0.bigv.io DNS is served, it's not possible to generate TXT records for it, but if you email me to verify, I should be able to confirm it for you directly.

Many apologies for the hassle this causes.

@sleevi
Copy link
Contributor

sleevi commented May 11, 2018 via email

@pcammish
Copy link
Contributor Author

pcammish commented May 11, 2018

Hi @sleevi, thanks for the quick reply - I'll see if we can get some engineering time here to enable the serving of TXT records on the uk0.bigv.io domain.

Removed uk0.bigv.io due to technical issues, bur we should be able to do another pull to add it later.
@pcammish
Copy link
Contributor Author

pcammish commented Jul 2, 2018

uk0.bigv.io has been removed for now to allow this to go through, but queries against dh.bytemark.co.uk and vm.bytemark.co.uk should be okay.

Once we have the technical issues resolved, I'll submit another pull with uk0.bigv.io included.

@weppos weppos self-assigned this Nov 8, 2018
Copy link
Member

@weppos weppos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

➜  ~ dig +short TXT _psl.vm.bytemark.co.uk
"https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/pull/620"
➜  ~ dig +short TXT _psl.dh.bytemark.co.uk
"https://github.com/publicsuffix/list/pull/620"

@weppos weppos merged commit 5af964e into publicsuffix:master Nov 8, 2018
weppos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2019
uk0.bigv.io is used as a domain name for our self-service customers, and therefore hosts various customer virtual machines under the same 'public' domain name. These domains are often used for administrative control panels, and other interfaces, so cookie security at this level would be very useful.

Note: This had to be excluded from #620 due to technical issues preventing the DNS verification at the time, but that issue has now been resolved.
@jeffrey-pinyan-cleandns jeffrey-pinyan-cleandns mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2023
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🩺 pending-validation Something needs to be validated
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants