-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Upgrade tokio to v1 #61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Petros Angelatos <petrosagg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petros Angelatos <petrosagg@gmail.com>
It looks like the current master is broken as far as CI is concerned so I fixed the warnings in this branch to get the CI to pass |
The only thing that's failing now is beyond my control. It looks like the CI is missing some key? Or it's because the PR is from an external fork. @MOZGIII can you take a look? |
@petrosagg Thanks for your contribution. |
hi @650elx. Is this still happening? Given the last commit to any of the branches is more than a year old would it make sense to merge this tokio v1 PR and then merging the updated SDK on top of it? |
We are currently forced to maintain a fork for this reason |
@petrosagg We're working on the completly new RustSDK (release date is neither known nor expected to come soon). |
84c6ad2
to
5fadd9f
Compare
Signed-off-by: Petros Angelatos <petrosagg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petros Angelatos <petrosagg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petros Angelatos <petrosagg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petros Angelatos <petrosagg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petros Angelatos <petrosagg@gmail.com>
rust >= 1.41 is required to build subtle, see: dalek-cryptography/subtle#77 rust >= 1.42 is required for the stabilization of the matches! macro rust >= 1.43 is required for inclusion of usize::MAX required by socket2 which is required by hyper rust >= 1.46 is required to allow match and if statements inside const expressions, which is required by socket2 which is required by hyper Signed-off-by: Petros Angelatos <petrosagg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petros Angelatos <petrosagg@gmail.com>
hey @650elx any luck with merging and releasing this PR? We've been using a fork of this in production for a while now with no issues and tests pass in CI |
Just a friendly ping, it would be great to get this PR in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@petrosagg Thanks for this valuable contribution.
I'll publish newer version of this package asap.
Awesome! Thank you! |
No description provided.