Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-think our solr config #163

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2022
Merged

Re-think our solr config #163

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2022

Conversation

bess
Copy link
Contributor

@bess bess commented Feb 17, 2022

In attempting to implement the solr changes needed for
blacklight_dynamic_sitemap, I encountered regular stack overflow errors
in the logs. I hypothesize that these are contributing to my difficulty
in adding new solr configuration changes. This PR updates solrconfig to
compatibility with Solr 8 (to match what we're running in production)
and strips out un-used stanzas. Now all the tests pass and I am no
longer seeing fatal errors in our logs. I'd like to promote these
changes to production, ensure everything is still working as expected,
and then try to implement the sitemap changes again.

Work toward #72

In attempting to implement the solr changes needed for
blacklight_dynamic_sitemap, I encountered regular stack overflow errors
in the logs. I hypothesize that these are contributing to my difficulty
in adding new solr configuration changes. This PR updates solrconfig to
compatibility with Solr 8 (to match what we're running in production)
and strips out un-used stanzas. Now all the tests pass and I am no
longer seeing fatal errors in our logs. I'd like to promote these
changes to production, ensure everything is still working as expected,
and then try to implement the sitemap changes again.
@@ -1,27 +1,26 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, but just for my own understanding, why was the encoding removed? Is this explicitly defined elsewhere for Solr as the default?

@jrgriffiniii
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you very much for this @bess! I am hesitant to merge this until testing this on staging (but if this is unwarranted, please let me know)

@hectorcorrea hectorcorrea merged commit f29cbd8 into main Feb 17, 2022
@hectorcorrea hectorcorrea deleted the test_solr branch February 17, 2022 14:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants