You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue proposes modifying our Ansible UFW role to manage the firewall configuration using the iptables-save format. This will provide a more robust and flexible way to define and maintain firewall rules.
Rationale:
Currently, the UFW role may rely on the ufw command-line utility to manage rules. While functional, this approach has limitations:
Limited expressiveness: The ufw command provides a simplified interface, which can be restrictive when defining complex rules or using advanced features of iptables.
Lack of direct control: Managing rules through ufw can be less transparent and may not provide direct control over the underlying iptables configuration.
Using the iptables-save format in a template offers several advantages:
Full control: We can define any valid iptables rule, including those not directly supported by ufw.
Improved readability: The iptables-save format is well-structured and easier to read and understand, making it simpler to manage complex firewall configurations.
Idempotency: Ansible can effectively manage the template, ensuring that the firewall configuration is always in the desired state.
Tasks:
Update the UFW Role:
Create a new template file (e.g., iptables.j2) within the role's templates directory.
Define the firewall rules in the template using the iptables-save format.
Include variables in the template to allow for customization (e.g., allowed IP addresses, ports, services).
Modify the role's tasks to use the template module to generate the iptables configuration file from the template.
Add a task to load the generated configuration using the iptables-restore command.
the order of rules matters in ufw. We add the new defaults for ssh
we create a template file that can allow users to place these rules and
have predictable implementation
Closes#5520
the order of rules matters in ufw. We add the new defaults for ssh
we create a template file that can allow users to place these rules and
have predictable implementation
Closes#5520
the order of rules matters in ufw. We add the new defaults for ssh
we create a template file that can allow users to place these rules and
have predictable implementation
Closes#5520
the order of rules matters in ufw. We add the new defaults for ssh
we create a template file that can allow users to place these rules and
have predictable implementation
Closes#5520
This issue proposes modifying our Ansible UFW role to manage the firewall configuration using the
iptables-save
format. This will provide a more robust and flexible way to define and maintain firewall rules.Rationale:
Currently, the UFW role may rely on the
ufw
command-line utility to manage rules. While functional, this approach has limitations:ufw
command provides a simplified interface, which can be restrictive when defining complex rules or using advanced features ofiptables
.ufw
can be less transparent and may not provide direct control over the underlyingiptables
configuration.Using the
iptables-save
format in a template offers several advantages:iptables
rule, including those not directly supported byufw
.iptables-save
format is well-structured and easier to read and understand, making it simpler to manage complex firewall configurations.Tasks:
Update the UFW Role:
iptables.j2
) within the role'stemplates
directory.iptables-save
format.template
module to generate theiptables
configuration file from the template.iptables-restore
command.Example
iptables.j2
Template:Example Playbook:
Benefits:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: