-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove pulp smash #851
Remove pulp smash #851
Conversation
f316380
to
11e5435
Compare
e55d747
to
da31265
Compare
5abf0db
to
3468545
Compare
Depends on this pulpcore PR: pulp/pulpcore#4177 |
Needs a new pulpcore release before the tests will work. |
a3a5ea4
to
f91506f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did not fully understand the changes to verify_publication_data
, and I don't fully understand why new pytest fixtures go in the files they go in as well as their naming scheme.
Putting aside the above caveats, these changes look sane to me, and the tests are green, and my gut feeling is that it makes more sense to get these refactors in and continue working on top, than it does to endlessly review them line by line, while continuing to work with the old test suit.
It combines two steps instead of getting the content and then list it for every type it will now do in one go. I thought it would help the readability of the the fixture but maybe I made it more obscure? Happy to change it again though. |
On a second thought we can just merge it and if its causing too much confusion later on it is simple to change that wouldn't effect much. |
closes #796