Skip to content

Conversation

alexjfisher
Copy link

In 0dcd91b the anchor pattern was removed, but not replaced with anything and thus broke the containment of java::config. This restores the original behaviour by using contain.

As noted in the code comment, the declaration remains in the same place in the code as evaluation order is important. java::config is a private class and relies on variables from the base class's scope having been set before it is evaluated.

Also see #543 (comment)

In 0dcd91b the `anchor` pattern was
removed, but not replaced with anything and thus broke the containment
of `java::config`.  This restores the original behaviour by using
`contain`.

As noted in the code comment, the declaration remains in the same place
in the code as evaluation order is important.  `java::config` is a
private class and relies on variables from the base class's scope having
been set before it is evaluated.
@alexjfisher alexjfisher requested review from a team and bastelfreak as code owners April 9, 2025 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants