-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 352
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(CODEMGMT-1177) Add environment definition feature #802
Closed
Closed
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
877c007
(CODEMGMT-1177) Add gitdir parameter for repos
reidmv aab691e
(CODEMGMT-1177) Implement environment redirect
reidmv 9138d8f
(CODEMGMT-1177) Add :git directive to environment
reidmv 8064b65
(CODEMGMT-1177) Add docs for environment feature
reidmv 07cc38b
(CODEMGMT-1177) Add tests for `environment`
reidmv 98d5e01
(CODEMGMT-1177) Allow mod alongside environment
reidmv 4db0d05
(CODEMGMT-1177) Clean up loop code
reidmv d08ade7
(CODEMGMT-1177) Unique names for env Puppetfiles
reidmv File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can I suggest a little less draconian rule? It should whitelist files like
README.md
, for example. This would allow users to document their workflow in the place where it's used.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@binford2k What would you think about documenting the workflow in the Puppetfile? Example
(note: this example was created for an old workflow iteration, ignore the actual instructions in it)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The concern with allowing more than the Puppetfile is potential conflicts and "flickering" during deployments with files of the same name in the code the Puppetfile "links" to. This already happens for the Puppetfile itself, of course.
It's also just an implementation limitation. In theory it could be engineered around.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not fully opposed to the idea, but certain files already have known meaning. For example, the nice pretty rendered view that GitHub gives you of
README.md
.