-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Solve issue with variable names like $in or $struct #748
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This is inelegant, but I stronly believe that allowing dollar signs and their variable name suffixes to both be first class citizens, is a bad idea. The dollar sign should initiate a token that is exempt from any other processing. Note that it would be possible to construct a regex similar to the one for IDENTIFIER, that only matches valid variable names. But it will be complex. It seems more maintainable to just consume all allowed characters, and then check validity with some simple golang in the parser actions. Fixes purpleidea#728
As an aside, I may have found a race in https://github.com/ffrank/mgmt/actions/runs/8247933356/job/22557152150 (I'm fairly sure I didn't introduce that.) |
Neat! I wasn't sure this was possible while also not blocking some other parsing changes I have. I appreciate the patch, but I will have to delay merging it to make sure it doesn't conflict with some other parsing stuff I have pending. Of note, if you look at the git history, you'll see I had something similar in until I realized it was causing a conflict. Lastly, there's a good chance I get rid of the $foo style naming entirely (not yet) and moving to just The race: yes there is one that I know about that needs fixing. |
So I suppose you are referring to 9e7b7fb. That was some funky stuff. The dichotomy of "identifier" vs. "dotted identifier" makes things a bit tricky. The logic you removed in 9e7b7fb was complicated indeed, and I can see some ambiguities for the parser resulting from this. The proposed patch avoids some (all?) of this by allowing the lexer to consume every variable name as a single token, and provide the information that the parser needs to make proper decisions (i.e., is it a dotted or undotted name token). |
Yes this is very clever, thank you. I'm slightly worried that doing this might make it more difficult in the future to add parser features without being ambiguous. I will look through my WIP feature branches and have a look. |
FWIW I think it is really really awkward to make the dots and particles of qualified names into first class citizens on the parser level. This is currently a valid resource
as is this
I argue that Yes even this is accepted right now (this patch only addresses the variable):
|
Make variables like
$foo
and$in
and$this.smells.funny
into single lexical tokens. This avoids lexing errors when the variable name without the dollar sign looks like a reserved word.(Frankly, I believe this is the more correct way to do this, and if not the only way, it is probably the easiest.)