-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 594
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed mypy sp check guidelines #4887
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Still 25 mypy errors are left, drafting this so that its easier to communicate changes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I've triggered the workflows! I haven't reviewed all the files, because I understand that the PR is still a draft and you have yet to complete the changes.
Checking https://learn.scientific-python.org/development/guides/repo-review/?repo=pybamm-team/pybamm, a few more rules where we have problems have popped up. So we shouldn't mark this PR as one that closes the linked issue. Could you please replace the "Fixes" keyword in the PR description with "Related to"?
It is also possible to add sp-repo-review
as a pre-commit hook so that new rules will be checked on every commit. I think we should investigate that and add it if running the checks is not too slow. I'm also curious to hear what @Saransh-cpp has to say about this.
docs/conf.py
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can exclude this file from the Mypy checks. It is not a part of PyBaMM's runtime, and maintaining typing rules here seems tedious.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #4887 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 98.71% 98.69% -0.02%
===========================================
Files 304 304
Lines 23495 23498 +3
===========================================
- Hits 23192 23191 -1
- Misses 303 307 +4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
It would be great to have repo-review as a pre-commit hook! @agriyakhetarpal maybe you can create a new independent issue for that? |
I've changed the PR description to related to and I also think it would be great to have a pre-commit hook for |
I've fixed the remaining errors too |
Description
Fixing mypy sp check guidelines
Related to #3489
Type of change
Please add a line in the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md to document the change (include PR #)
Important checks:
Please confirm the following before marking the PR as ready for review:
nox -s pre-commit
nox -s tests
nox -s doctests