-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
search the Vec
for small LazyIndexMap
s
#55
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
927f3e1
search the vec for small LazyIndexMaps
samuelcolvin a596dbf
switch from Cell to Arc<Mutux>
samuelcolvin d9e31e8
use AtomicUsize
samuelcolvin 4c49e3e
improve coverage
samuelcolvin 553769d
improve coverage, take 2
samuelcolvin 497a5ad
improve coverage on LazyIndexMap
samuelcolvin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@davidhewitt I'm interested if you think there's something faster than
Arc<Mutex<...>>
we can use where while still satisfying the requirement of implementingSync
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If
last_find
is not a problem for correctness, could just useUnsafeCell
? E.g. if worst case is that the field isn't found fromlast_find
to the end, and then the start is searched, it's probably suitable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(using
UnsafeCell
you'll need to wrap it likestruct LastFind(UnsafeCell<usize>)
andunsafe impl Sync for LastFind
.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also
AtomicUsize
is the safe option which will still be much faster than a mutex and on some platforms maybe no different toUnsafeCell
, might want theportable_atomic
crate as a dependency given the range of platforms this might be packaged on.