Skip to content

Accept rename to same name #736

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2016
Merged

Accept rename to same name #736

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2016

Conversation

spencerahill
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #724

@@ -1223,7 +1223,8 @@ def rename(self, name_dict, inplace=False):
----------
name_dict : dict-like
Dictionary whose keys are current variable or dimension names and
whose values are new names.
whose values are new names (although the new name is permitted
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe it would be better to simple state "are desired names". It seems pretty logical that the same names would be OK.

@shoyer
Copy link
Member

shoyer commented Jan 31, 2016

Could you please add a brief note to what's new for 0.7.1? This should probably go under "enhancements" or "bug fixes". You'll need to create a new section whats-new.rst since this is the first fix -- don't sweat the details very much, I'll go over them before the release :).

@spencerahill
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure, will do all of these.

shoyer added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2016
@shoyer shoyer merged commit 0f77748 into pydata:master Feb 2, 2016
@shoyer
Copy link
Member

shoyer commented Feb 2, 2016

Thanks!

@spencerahill
Copy link
Contributor Author

No problem. Sorry for the extra commit -- I tried to squash them together, but I'm new to rebase and apparently didn't do it right. Thanks for helping me incorporate this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants