Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tf32 vs fp32 fix #157

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2022
Merged

tf32 vs fp32 fix #157

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2022

Conversation

puririshi98
Copy link
Contributor

I had originally made this a part of my PR tf32 vs fp32 but somehow its not there anymore. this is an essential part of letting a user choose between tf32 and fp32. without it our internal CI fails w/ numerical issues, since the vanilla matmuls run in fp32 but grouped gemm incorrectly runs in tf32

…ts not there anymore. this is an essential part of letting a user choose between tf32 and fp32. without it our internal CI fails w/ numerical issues, since the vanilla matmuls run in fp32 but grouped gemm incorrectly runs in tf32
@puririshi98 puririshi98 enabled auto-merge (squash) December 5, 2022 19:59
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #157 (f503f0f) into master (a767c5b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #157   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.69%   92.69%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines         671      671           
=======================================
  Hits          622      622           
  Misses         49       49           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@puririshi98 puririshi98 merged commit 08d02e9 into master Dec 5, 2022
@puririshi98 puririshi98 deleted the fix_fp32 branch December 5, 2022 20:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants