Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add disjoint neighbor sampling test #89

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2022
Merged

Add disjoint neighbor sampling test #89

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 5, 2022

Conversation

rusty1s
Copy link
Member

@rusty1s rusty1s commented Sep 5, 2022

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #89 (6d7591b) into master (4d4a26b) will increase coverage by 3.53%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 6d7591b differs from pull request most recent head e37059c. Consider uploading reports for the commit e37059c to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #89      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.74%   78.28%   +3.53%     
==========================================
  Files          14       14              
  Lines         392      396       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          293      310      +17     
+ Misses         99       86      -13     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pyg_lib/csrc/sampler/cpu/neighbor_kernel.cpp 48.30% <ø> (+4.23%) ⬆️
pyg_lib/csrc/utils/cpu/convert.h 100.00% <100.00%> (+55.55%) ⬆️
pyg_lib/csrc/sampler/cpu/mapper.h 91.42% <0.00%> (+8.57%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@rusty1s rusty1s merged commit c5f3488 into master Sep 5, 2022
@rusty1s rusty1s deleted the disjoint_test branch September 5, 2022 21:08
@rusty1s rusty1s changed the title Add 'disjoint` neighbor sampling test Add disjoint neighbor sampling test Sep 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants