Use standard thread library #580
Conversation
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes replace the custom Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (7)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (3)
executorlib/interactive/shared.py (3)
92-92: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate type hint to use
Threadinstead ofRaisingThread.The type hint in the method signature still references the removed
RaisingThreadclass.-def _set_process(self, process: list[RaisingThread]): # type: ignore +def _set_process(self, process: list[Thread]):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
92-92: Undefined name
RaisingThread(F821)
96-97: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate docstring to use
Threadinstead ofRaisingThread.The docstring still references the removed
RaisingThreadclass.- Args: - process (List[RaisingThread]): The process for the executor. + Args: + process (List[Thread]): The process for the executor.
564-565: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUpdate docstring to use
Threadinstead ofRaisingThread.The docstring still references the removed
RaisingThreadclass.- RaisingThread, dict: thread for communicating with the python process which is executing the function and + Thread, dict: thread for communicating with the python process which is executing the function and
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
executorlib/base/executor.py (1)
147-155: Update docstring to reflect Thread usage.The docstring still references
RaisingThreadinstead ofThread.- process (RaisingThread): The process for the executor. + process (Thread): The process for the executor.tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py (1)
84-93: Add test coverage for exception handling.With the switch to standard
Thread, we should add test cases to verify that exceptions in worker threads are properly handled and don't silently fail.Consider adding a test case like this:
def test_thread_exception_handling(self): with FileExecutor() as exe: def failing_function(): raise ValueError("Test exception") future = exe.submit(failing_function) with self.assertRaises(ValueError): future.result()Also applies to: 125-134, 166-175
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
executorlib/base/executor.py(3 hunks)executorlib/cache/executor.py(2 hunks)executorlib/interactive/executor.py(2 hunks)executorlib/interactive/shared.py(4 hunks)executorlib/standalone/__init__.py(0 hunks)executorlib/standalone/thread.py(0 hunks)tests/test_cache_executor_serial.py(4 hunks)tests/test_dependencies_executor.py(4 hunks)tests/test_shared_thread.py(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- tests/test_shared_thread.py
- executorlib/standalone/thread.py
- executorlib/standalone/init.py
🔇 Additional comments (7)
executorlib/interactive/executor.py (1)
43-54: LGTM! Thread instantiation looks correct.The thread instantiation maintains the same functionality while using the standard
Threadclass.executorlib/cache/executor.py (1)
66-80: LGTM! Thread instantiation looks correct.The thread instantiation maintains the same functionality while using the standard
Threadclass.tests/test_dependencies_executor.py (3)
6-6: LGTM! Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to use the standard
Threadclass from thethreadingmodule.
93-101: LGTM! Thread instantiation updated correctly.The thread instantiation has been updated to use the standard
Threadclass, maintaining the same target function and keyword arguments.
149-157: LGTM! Remaining thread instantiations updated correctly.The remaining thread instantiations have been updated to use the standard
Threadclass, maintaining the same functionality.Also applies to: 207-215
executorlib/interactive/shared.py (2)
8-8: LGTM! Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been updated to use the standard
Threadclass from thethreadingmodule.
152-156: LGTM! Thread instantiations updated correctly.All thread instantiations have been updated to use the standard
Threadclass, maintaining the same functionality.Also applies to: 208-211, 592-595
| @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ def __init__(self, max_cores: Optional[int] = None): | |||
| cloudpickle_register(ind=3) | |||
| self._max_cores = max_cores | |||
| self._future_queue: Optional[queue.Queue] = queue.Queue() | |||
| self._process: Optional[Union[RaisingThread, list[RaisingThread]]] = None | |||
| self._process: Optional[Union[Thread, list[Thread]]] = None | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify exception handling behavior with standard Thread.
The switch from RaisingThread to standard Thread might affect how exceptions are propagated from worker threads to the main thread. The standard Thread class doesn't automatically propagate exceptions to the main thread.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for exception handling patterns in the codebase
rg -A 5 "try:|except:|finally:" --type pyLength of output: 11463
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to RaisingThread in the repository
rg "RaisingThread"Length of output: 477
Attention: Inconsistent Thread Type References May Affect Exception Propagation
The update in executorlib/base/executor.py correctly changes the _process annotation to use the standard Thread. However, several parts of the codebase still reference RaisingThread (e.g., docstrings and method signatures in executorlib/base/executor.py and executorlib/interactive/shared.py). This inconsistency could lead to confusion regarding exception propagation—since the standard Thread does not automatically propagate exceptions to the main thread as RaisingThread might have.
- Action Items:
- Ensure that exception handling with the standard
Threadis explicitly managed if propagating errors is required. - Update all references (docstrings, type annotations, and method signatures) from
RaisingThreadtoThread(or alternatively, reintroduceRaisingThreadfunctionality where needed) for consistency.
- Ensure that exception handling with the standard
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #580 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 95.96% 95.91% -0.06%
==========================================
Files 26 25 -1
Lines 1191 1174 -17
==========================================
- Hits 1143 1126 -17
Misses 48 48 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Summary by CodeRabbit