Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bugs with Sun Grid Engine #382

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 28, 2025
Merged

Fix bugs with Sun Grid Engine #382

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Jan 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a method to extract job ID from Sun Grid Engine job submission output.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new static method get_job_id_from_output to the SunGridEngineCommands class in the SGE (Sun Grid Engine) wrapper. This method is designed to extract a job ID from the output of a job submission command by processing the input string, stripping whitespace, and splitting it at the period to return the first part as an integer.

Changes

File Change Summary
pysqa/wrapper/sge.py Added static method get_job_id_from_output() to SunGridEngineCommands class for extracting job ID from queue submission output

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant SunGridEngineCommands
    User->>SunGridEngineCommands: get_job_id_from_output(queue_submit_output)
    SunGridEngineCommands-->>User: Returns job ID as integer
Loading

Poem

🐰 In the grid of engines bright and bold,
A method springs to life, job IDs unfold!
Splitting lines with rabbit-like precision,
Extracting numbers with coding vision.
SGE's secrets now leap with glee! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6cbc16c and 2fd8154.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pysqa/wrapper/sge.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pysqa/wrapper/sge.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, 3.13)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen linked an issue Jan 28, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2bbaef1 and 6cbc16c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pysqa/wrapper/sge.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, 3.9)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pysqa/wrapper/sge.py (1)

85-88: Verify consistency with other scheduler implementations.

Let's ensure this implementation aligns with other scheduler wrappers and the base class.

✅ Verification successful

Implementation is consistent with scheduler framework

The get_job_id_from_output method:

  • Follows the abstract base class contract
  • Uses the same parsing strategy as Slurm for the -terse output format
  • Is properly integrated with the job submission workflow
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar job ID parsing methods in other scheduler implementations
# and verify the -terse flag behavior in SGE documentation.

# Check for similar methods in other scheduler implementations
echo "Checking for similar methods in other scheduler implementations..."
rg -l "job_id.*output" --type py

# Look for the base class implementation
echo -e "\nChecking base class (SchedulerCommands) implementation..."
rg -l "class SchedulerCommands" --type py

# Check if other classes parse job IDs differently
echo -e "\nChecking for other job ID parsing patterns..."
rg "job.*id.*=|jobid.*=|id.*=.*job" --type py

# Look for SGE documentation references
echo -e "\nChecking for SGE documentation or test files..."
fd -e rst -e md -e txt . | xargs rg -l "qsub.*terse"

Length of output: 4089


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check base class and implementations
echo "Checking base class for job ID parsing methods..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class SchedulerCommands {
  $$$
  get_job_id_from_output($$$) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

echo -e "\nChecking specific implementations of get_job_id_from_output..."
rg "get_job_id_from_output" -B 2 -A 4 --type py

echo -e "\nChecking SGE submit command construction..."
rg "submit_job_command" -B 2 -A 4 pysqa/wrapper/sge.py

Length of output: 5439

Comment on lines 85 to 88
@staticmethod
def get_job_id_from_output(queue_submit_output: str) -> int:
"""Extracts the job ID from the output of the job submission command."""
return int(queue_submit_output.splitlines()[-1].rstrip().lstrip().split()[-1])
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and simplify the parsing logic.

The current implementation makes assumptions about the output format and lacks error handling. Since the class uses the -terse flag in submit_job_command, the output should contain only the job ID.

Consider this safer implementation:

     @staticmethod
     def get_job_id_from_output(queue_submit_output: str) -> int:
-        """Extracts the job ID from the output of the job submission command."""
+        """Extracts the job ID from the output of the job submission command.
+        
+        Args:
+            queue_submit_output: Output string from qsub -terse command
+                                containing only the job ID.
+        
+        Returns:
+            The extracted job ID as an integer.
+            
+        Raises:
+            ValueError: If the output is empty or contains an invalid job ID.
+            
+        Example:
+            >>> SunGridEngineCommands.get_job_id_from_output("123456\\n")
+            123456
+        """
+        if not queue_submit_output:
+            raise ValueError("Empty output from job submission command")
+        try:
+            return int(queue_submit_output.strip())
+        except ValueError as e:
+            raise ValueError(f"Invalid job ID in output: {queue_submit_output!r}") from e
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
@staticmethod
def get_job_id_from_output(queue_submit_output: str) -> int:
"""Extracts the job ID from the output of the job submission command."""
return int(queue_submit_output.splitlines()[-1].rstrip().lstrip().split()[-1])
@staticmethod
def get_job_id_from_output(queue_submit_output: str) -> int:
"""Extracts the job ID from the output of the job submission command.
Args:
queue_submit_output: Output string from qsub -terse command
containing only the job ID.
Returns:
The extracted job ID as an integer.
Raises:
ValueError: If the output is empty or contains an invalid job ID.
Example:
>>> SunGridEngineCommands.get_job_id_from_output("123456\\n")
123456
"""
if not queue_submit_output:
raise ValueError("Empty output from job submission command")
try:
return int(queue_submit_output.strip())
except ValueError as e:
raise ValueError(f"Invalid job ID in output: {queue_submit_output!r}") from e

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit de4c9e2 into main Jan 28, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the sge branch January 28, 2025 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[bug] SGE wrapper missing get_job_id_from_output?
1 participant