Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ENH] Add lazy imports to speed up the time taken to load pyjanitor (part 2) #1180
[ENH] Add lazy imports to speed up the time taken to load pyjanitor (part 2) #1180
Changes from all commits
06776e2
14916bc
794fa8c
6610448
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I saw all packages in
janitor/math.py
were wrapped bylazy.load
.But
janitor/functions/impute.py
only wrappedscipy.stats
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i didn't try to go beyond original @ericmjl code changes.
it could be true that some newer additions on dev would require changes in imports. i assume we can address it later in subsequent PRs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, @Zeroto521. We can continue to improve coverage of lazy loading, so no worries here. Plus we might also benefit from Python having lazy loading by default! (I'm thinking of PEP690 here.) Let's stick with what we have for now.