-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 306
Support isinstance
constraints in inference
#2846
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
zenlyj
wants to merge
9
commits into
pylint-dev:main
Choose a base branch
from
zenlyj:constraint-type
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+451
β32
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
27f14a7
Implement type constraint
zenlyj f7b9b2b
Add tests
zenlyj 4d65ad7
Add changelog
zenlyj 925ffef
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] 820e078
Use identity checks
zenlyj f19e9bf
Add more tests
zenlyj 16032d5
Exclude StopIteration handlers from coverage
zenlyj d44dae8
Add test case for uninferable isinstance
zenlyj 3bcec6b
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This
Uninferable
check is not covered by tests, it should be unreachable in runtime. I am including it as a safe guard becausehelpers.object_isinstance()
returnsbool | Uninferable
, but I am also fine with removing it. Thoughts?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you share more details about why this is unreachable? I see that we short-circuit if inferred is uninferable, but it wasn't apparent to me why inferring again wouldn't return uninferable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looked into
object_isinstance()
, there are two main cases where it can returnUninferable
:When the type of the object cannot be inferred, happens when:
inferred
is an item within a list of inferred results.inferred.infer()
. This may occur wheninferred
itself isUninferable
, but as you mentioned there is already a short-circuit check above.When the type can be inferred but is not an instance of
nodes.ClassDef
. However, it seems that the inferred type always appears to be a ClassDef, or wrapped in a ClassDef proxy.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's what I'm unsure about, inferring an item may return something besides itself.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Trying to think of a scenario where inferring a non-Uninferable inference result returns multiple results. Not sure if that's a common case but I'd be interested to know if you have any concrete examples in mind.
An alternative is to mock the method to return
Uninferable
:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm good with that. Sorry I don't have the time to construct a concrete example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries, I will go with the mocking approach for now. If anyone has encountered this before, feel free to chime in!