-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Decorator false positive: unsubscriptable-object
, no-member
, unsupported-membership-test
, not-an-iterable
, too-many-function-args
#1694
Comments
This is a known issue, we don't yet support custom decorators/descriptors. |
I'd like to write this but I'm not finding any unit/functional tests for the existing decorator code. Am I missing something? |
Fixes theochem#73 Not all pylint exclusions can be removed, essentially due to pylint bugs resulting in many false negatives, see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47972143/using-attr-with-pylint pylint-dev/pylint#1694 The good solution is to disable all type-checking warnings of pylint and to use a proper type checker like mypy instead. Related changes: - reaction_coordinate, ipoint, npoint, istep and nstep move to extra. - many getattr and hasattr calls are replaced by nicer code. - ArrayTypeCheckDescriptor is replaced by two simple functions. - Document IOData.charge - Bug got fixed in poscar format (gvecs)
This is a known issue, pylint don't yet (2017) support custom decorators/descriptors pylint-dev/pylint#1694
Heya, I assume this is still an issue? Using the example of a """My example"""
from typing import Any, Callable, Generic, TypeVar
ReturnType = TypeVar('ReturnType')
class classproperty(Generic[ReturnType]): # pylint: disable=invalid-name
"""A decorator for class properties"""
def __init__(self, getter: Callable[[Any], ReturnType]) -> None:
self.getter = getter
def __get__(self, instance: Any, owner: Any) -> ReturnType:
return self.getter(owner)
class Example:
"""An example class"""
@classproperty
def class_property(cls) -> str:
return 'class property'
Example.class_property.isdigit() This works correctly for static analysers like mypy and VS Code's Pylance.
You get: $ pylint example.py
************* Module example
example.py:19:4: E0213: Method should have "self" as first argument (no-self-argument)
example.py:19:4: R0201: Method could be a function (no-self-use)
example.py:22:0: E1101: Method 'class_property' has no 'isdigit' member (no-member) |
FYI, I created a quick and dirty pylint plugin to get rid of these, but any feedback/improvements welcome! """pylint plugin for ``aiida-core`` specific issues."""
import astroid
def register(linter): # pylint: disable=unused-argument
"""Register linters (unused)"""
def remove_classprop_imports(import_from: astroid.ImportFrom):
"""Remove any ``classproperty`` imports (handled in ``replace_classprops``)"""
import_from.names = [name for name in import_from.names if name[0] != 'classproperty']
def replace_classprops(func: astroid.FunctionDef):
"""Replace ``classproperty`` decorated methods.
As discussed in https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/1694, pylint does not understand the ``@classproperty``
decorator, and so mistakes the method as a function, rather than an attribute of the class.
If the method is annotated, this leads to pylint issuing ``no-member`` errors.
This transform replaces ``classproperty`` decorated methods with an annotated attribute::
from aiida.common.lang import classproperty
class MyClass:
@classproperty
def my_property(cls) -> AnnotatedType:
return cls.my_value
MyClass.my_property.attribute # <-- pylint issues: Method 'my_property' has no 'attribute' member (no-member)
class MyClass:
my_property: AnnotatedType
"""
# ignore methods without annotations or decorators
if not (func.returns and func.decorators and func.decorators.nodes):
return
# ignore methods that are specified as abstract
if any(isinstance(node, astroid.Name) and 'abstract' in node.name for node in func.decorators.nodes):
return
if any(isinstance(node, astroid.Attribute) and 'abstract' in node.attrname for node in func.decorators.nodes):
return
# convert methods with @classproperty decorator
if isinstance(func.decorators.nodes[0], astroid.Name) and func.decorators.nodes[0].name == 'classproperty':
assign = astroid.AnnAssign(lineno=func.lineno, col_offset=func.col_offset, parent=func.parent)
assign.simple = 1
assign.target = astroid.AssignName(func.name, lineno=assign.lineno, col_offset=assign.col_offset, parent=assign)
assign.annotation = func.returns
assign.annotation.parent = assign
func.parent.locals[func.name] = [assign.target]
return assign
astroid.MANAGER.register_transform(astroid.ImportFrom, remove_classprop_imports)
astroid.MANAGER.register_transform(astroid.FunctionDef, replace_classprops) |
As discussed in #5176 and pylint-dev/pylint#1694, pylint does not understand the `@classproperty` decorator, and so mistakes the method as a function, rather than an attribute of the class. This commit adds a pylint transform plugin, to remove false-positives. (see: https://pylint.pycqa.org/en/latest/how_tos/transform_plugins.html)
stack overflow says this is due to a known bug in pylint: pylint-dev/pylint#1694
* Bump attrs from 21.2.0 to 21.4.0 Bumps [attrs](https://github.com/python-attrs/attrs) from 21.2.0 to 21.4.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/python-attrs/attrs/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/python-attrs/attrs/blob/main/CHANGELOG.rst) - [Commits](python-attrs/attrs@21.2.0...21.4.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: attrs dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> * replacements to use modern attrs attr.ib ➡ attrs.field attr.s ➡ attrs.define attr.validators ➡ attrs.validators * ignore pylint warnings stack overflow says this is due to a known bug in pylint: pylint-dev/pylint#1694 Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: konstantin <konstantin.klein@hochfrequenz.de>
Test case from #818 involving the Voluptuous library: """Demonstration of no-value-for-parameter using Voluptuous"""
#
# This code shows the proper use of the python Voluptuous
# library. IsFile() is a callable that can be passed
# as a dictionary value in a schema definition. When called
# it validates the parameter that is passed in.
#
# It is defined as
# def IsFile(v):
# but called from within Voluptuous as
# IsFile()('passed param')
#
# Pylint finds
#
# E: 24,39: No value for argument 'v' in function call (no-value-for-parameter)
#
from voluptuous import Schema, IsFile, MultipleInvalid
def main():
"""Testing Voluptuous IsFile() validator"""
data = {'filename': 'not a file.txt'}
schema = Schema({'filename': IsFile()})
try:
schema(data)
except MultipleInvalid as e:
print("Success:", e.msg)
else:
print("Failure: IsFile did not work")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main() |
unsubscriptable-object
, no-member
, unsupported-membership-test
, not-an-iterable
, too-many-function-args
Steps to reproduce
I use simple classproperty decorator:
Example of usages:
Current behavior
There are a lot of false positive errors:
Expected behavior
If I make interface class where declare expected value the errors are not raised:
Expected behavior: no false-positive errors
pylint --version output
pylint 1.7.4,
astroid 1.5.3
Python 3.5.2 (default, Sep 14 2017, 22:51:06)
[GCC 5.4.0 20160609]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: