Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug in MatrixNormal.sample #3585

Closed
aseyboldt opened this issue Aug 13, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #4368
Closed

Bug in MatrixNormal.sample #3585

aseyboldt opened this issue Aug 13, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #4368

Comments

@aseyboldt
Copy link
Member

If one of the matrix parameters is a random variable, then MatrixNormal.sample runs into shape errors because it might be passed an array of col or row matrices instead of just one. pm.sample_prior_predictive will fail in a case like this:

import numpy as np
import pymc3 as pm
K = 3
D = 15
mu_0 = np.zeros((D,K))
lambd = 1.0
with pm.Model() as model:
    sd_dist = pm.HalfCauchy.dist(beta=2.5)
    packedL = pm.LKJCholeskyCov(f"packedL",eta=2, n=D, sd_dist=sd_dist)
    L = pm.expand_packed_triangular(D, packedL, lower=True)
    Sigma = pm.Deterministic(f"Sigma", L.dot(L.T)) # D x D covariance
    mu = pm.MatrixNormal(
        f"mu", 
        mu=mu_0, 
        rowcov=(1 / lambd) * Sigma, 
        colcov = np.eye(K), shape=(D,K))
    prior = pm.sample_prior_predictive(2)

In this example rowchol will have shape (2, 15, 15).
https://github.com/pymc-devs/pymc3/blob/master/pymc3/distributions/multivariate.py#L1598

Originally reported by calvinm on discord:
https://discourse.pymc.io/t/reshape-error-inside-sample-prior-predictive/3715

@rpgoldman
Copy link
Contributor

Should we add this to the tests, as an expected fail for now?

@aseyboldt
Copy link
Member Author

Maybe it is not that hard to fix, we could just broadcast both matrices and mu to (sizeprod, M, N), and after making the samples reshape back to size + (M, N)...

@lucianopaz
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is similar to #2848. Most, if not all, of the multivariate distributions have some shape handling defects when their distribution parameters depend on other RVs.

@michael-ziedalski
Copy link

I am just wondering now then, what would hypothetically need to be done, as a general fix, to get rid of this bug for the rest of the distributions?

@Sayam753
Copy link
Member

I am just wondering now then, what would hypothetically need to be done, as a general fix, to get rid of this bug for the rest of the distributions?

I sense broadcasting all the parameters just after they are drawn and then proceeding with calculations, will be a good option. That's how MvNormal.random method is fixed in #4207.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants