Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix transform projection bug #5444

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 3, 2022

Conversation

ricardoV94
Copy link
Member

Replace RVs by respective value variables in the graph of untransformed variables

This fixes incorrect behavior, where deterministic projection from transformed (sampling) to untransformed space would be nonsensical when transforms depend on other graph variables

…ed variables

This fixes incorrect behavior, where deterministic projection from transformed (sampling) to untransformed space would be nonsensical when transforms depend on other graph variables
@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 added the bug label Feb 3, 2022
@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 added this to the v4.0.0b3 milestone Feb 3, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #5444 (ae835f5) into main (25c6772) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5444   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.39%   81.39%           
=======================================
  Files          82       82           
  Lines       14212    14214    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        11568    11570    +2     
  Misses       2644     2644           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pymc/model.py 85.97% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

@twiecki twiecki merged commit 2f8f110 into pymc-devs:main Feb 3, 2022
@ricardoV94 ricardoV94 deleted the fix_transform_projection_bug branch February 3, 2022 17:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants