Exponential scale default to 1.0

[ricardoV94]

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pymc--7604.org.readthedocs.build/en/7604/

[Armavica]

Any opinion on putting both lam and scale behind the *, to force users to specify which one they want? I'm sure there must be silent parameterization errors because of that

[ricardoV94]

Any opinion on putting both lam and scale behind the *, to force users to specify which one they want? I'm sure there must be silent parameterization errors because of that

That would be a major change, historically only lam existed and could be passed by argument only. There was also a discussion with Normal, and people didn't want to force them to be kwarg only

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.85%. Comparing base (3f3aeb9) to head (6a45ef6).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7604   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.85%   92.85%           
=======================================
  Files         106      106           
  Lines       17742    17742           
=======================================
  Hits        16474    16474           
  Misses       1268     1268           

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
pymc/distributions/continuous.py	98.25% <100.00%> (ø)
pymc/step_methods/hmc/nuts.py	97.43% <ø> (ø)