You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The metadata generated by flit build advertises my distribution as providing an extra called .none:
provides_extras: ['.none', 'doc', 'test']
Was that intended to be publicly available, or is it a bug? Reading the source, it looks as though this was just supposed to be an an internal token, not actually making it into the final package. I would rather flit not create the .none extra in project metadata.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
## Summary
Some packages erroneously include an extra named `.none`. It turns out
that certain versions of `flit` included this by accident:
pypa/flit#228.
This PR adds leniency for that specific extra name.
Closes#1363.
Closes#1399.
The metadata generated by flit build advertises my distribution as providing an extra called
.none
:Was that intended to be publicly available, or is it a bug? Reading the source, it looks as though this was just supposed to be an an internal token, not actually making it into the final package. I would rather flit not create the
.none
extra in project metadata.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: