Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document CI #7247

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2019
Merged

Document CI #7247

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2019

Conversation

xavfernandez
Copy link
Member

@xavfernandez xavfernandez commented Oct 20, 2019

Following #6791

Several notes:

  • does MacOS on x86/32bit make sense ?
  • how many versions of PyPy do we want to support ? Apparently we are testing PyPy 6.0 while 7.2 is now available.
  • is there a reason why are only testing x86 interpreters on Windows ?

@xavfernandez xavfernandez added skip news Does not need a NEWS file entry (eg: trivial changes) type: maintenance Related to Development and Maintenance Processes type: docs Documentation related labels Oct 20, 2019
docs/html/development/ci.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/html/development/ci.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
@xavfernandez xavfernandez force-pushed the document_CI branch 2 times, most recently from 05105ae to bbc1b4f Compare October 21, 2019 07:43
@xavfernandez
Copy link
Member Author

does MacOS on x86/32bit make sense ?

Apparently (https://support.apple.com/en-gb/HT208436), 32-bit support has been deprecated for a while and completely dropped in latest Catalina version (october 2019).

@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member

This is a great idea.

I'd say we should probably also add a CTA that we'd love to have someone help us with our CI situation (e.g. making it faster, or making it more complete without slowing down CI times) -- linking to https://wiki.python.org/psf/Fundable%20Packaging%20Improvements#Robust_interoperability_testing.

(it might be worth asking someone on the Packaging-WG of the PSF, if they could add a dedicated section there, about this)

@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member

@xavfernandez Is this still WIP? If so, would you be OK to merge this after adding a message like 289af52?

@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member

pradyunsg commented Oct 30, 2019

* Apparently we are testing PyPy 6.0 while 7.2 is now available.

I think we should start tracking the latest PyPy release.

is there a reason why are only testing x86 interpreters on Windows ?

🤷‍♂

Windows CI is super slow already, so I'm very much weary of adding more time to it.

@xavfernandez xavfernandez changed the title WIP: Document CI Document CI Oct 31, 2019
@xavfernandez
Copy link
Member Author

@xavfernandez Is this still WIP? If so, would you be OK to merge this after adding a message like 289af52?

Good idea, I've added the same message and created #7279 to try to clarify our strategy.

I'll merge this one once the builds complete.

@xavfernandez xavfernandez merged commit 01c953b into pypa:master Oct 31, 2019
@xavfernandez xavfernandez deleted the document_CI branch October 31, 2019 14:39
@xavfernandez xavfernandez restored the document_CI branch October 31, 2019 14:39
@xavfernandez xavfernandez deleted the document_CI branch October 31, 2019 14:39
@xavfernandez xavfernandez restored the document_CI branch October 31, 2019 14:40
@lock lock bot added the auto-locked Outdated issues that have been locked by automation label Nov 30, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 30, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
auto-locked Outdated issues that have been locked by automation skip news Does not need a NEWS file entry (eg: trivial changes) type: docs Documentation related type: maintenance Related to Development and Maintenance Processes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants