vendor in requirementslib==1.6.4 #5082
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fraser-langton
pushed a commit
to fraser-langton/pipenv
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2022
* vendor in requirementslib==1.6.4 * add news fragment.
|
🎉 Wow, so fast to iron things out. thanks! 🙏🏼 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes deprecation warnings with new
setuptoolsversions by vendoring in newrequirementslibfix.The issue
Fixes #5081
The fix
How does this pull request fix your problem? Did you consider any alternatives? Why is this the best solution, in your opinion?
The checklist
news/directory to describe this fix with the extension.bugfix,.feature,.behavior,.doc..vendor. or.trivial(this will appear in the release changelog). Use semantic line breaks and name the file after the issue number or the PR #.