Consider a link in README Resources to PyScript tagged Stack Overflow page

[nmstoker]

Checklist

• I added a descriptive title
• I searched for other feature requests and couldn't find a duplicate (including also the type-feature tag)
• I confirmed that it's not related to another project are area (see the above section)

What is the idea?

Often README files for widely used packages/frameworks include a link to the Stack Overflow page for questions tagged with the label associated with that particular project.

I wonder if it would be useful for PyScript.

The link is: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/PyScript

There is that slightly wrinkle that there is another project called pyscript (here) but it looks like the majority of tagged SO questions are relating to this project now.

Therefore, unless people think there's a chance to switch this project to use a distinct tag (which i suspect would not gain traction from the average person posting directly to SO) then it seems like ploughing on is probably fine (although it may frustrate the original project participants somewhat)

Why is this needed

This would help direct users with questions that are less suited to the GH Issues section to a place they may well find answers or be able to ask their question (if nothing similar exists already)

What should happen?

Simply add the link to the README under the Resources section

I'll create a one-liner PR for this now (obvs it can be rejected/ amended if it doesn't seem right)

Additional Context

N/A

[marimeireles]

I think this is okay.
Or do we want to have exclusive focus on the forums @fpliger?

[fpliger]

I'm +-0 on this. The core team is more focused on the supporting discussions on the forums (since it's easier and more scoped, helping the team to stay focused). The new community repo will be a great place to also add other places/links, like this one, that are more community promoted/curated, rather than the official docs.

[marimeireles]

Let's do it on the Pyscript-collective?
I'll move the issue, I think the discussion fits there better.

[nmstoker]

This was already resolved by
#27
I think i must have overlooked some of the tagging to make it obvious